In the sphere of irrelevance, yr speech is a permuted locution.
My utterances are not utterly algorithmically irrelevant.
[window-sill]
The squeaking ambiguities are not irrelevant to the permuted acts of utterance.
[come anew]
The endless ambiguities in your voice are being interpolated.
[nasturtium]
The algorithmic extraction is being gored in the embedded waves of darkness.
[pansy]
The extracted inversion is superficially disoriented.
[pale eaten glance]
The parasitic paradox is inaccessible to my inner rectum.
[nestled fur lining]
One parasite is humping another outside of my imagination.
[air blossom]
The superimposed delimits are endless interpolations of disorientations.
[sliced stains]
The gibberish is so obscure it subsumes the sublime.
[pomp pump]
May I interrupt the sphere of unshapely ambiguities.
[climax dot]
The unshapely paradigm is parasitic and inaccessible to interpolated analysis.
[lil' bean dew]
The hermetic sublime is shitty.
[dust core]
There are no subsumed delimits to its disorientation.
[lightly lipless]
The messy inscriptions are overflowing into poetic paradoxes.
[undoubtedly quiet]
Who subverted the spatially collapsing subtext.
[wad head]
Uttered numbers are woven into disoriented ambiguities.
[mother-of-pearl]
The syntax udders emulate slangy subtexts.
[nut wailing stars]
The structure collapses as the sublime is being inscribed.
[ice white-knuckling it]
The structure of disassembled abstractions is or is not true.
[long colored calamity]
The accuracy of what is being inscribed is slovenly lovely.
[itching bone]
There is a disoriented parasite in my hermetic imagination.
[chin shine]
The uttered paradox is being superimposed upon permuted gibberish.
[smoke-stacks]
The unuttered paradox is spatially blatant.
[dreaded bouncer muscle]
What is blatantly gibberish contradicts the hermetic paradigm.
[wade in it]
The paradigm of gibberish is being interpreted.
[ham coop]
The unblatant subtext is or is not true.
[skin of night]
The disassembled truth is false, endless waves of dark root canals.
[neck hole]
The ultimate poetic truth is percolating inaccurately.
[glass pail]
The syntax-slang is woven into messy ambiguities.
[I forsook the dross]
What appears is inaccessible, but the context is disassembled.
[O withering shrub of death]
An abstract voice is squeaky and true and false.
[wetness lettuce]
The poetic is extracted while the interpolated is being embedded.
[coal necklaces]
--Bob BrueckL
Saturday, March 25
HÎ all,
http://www.vilt.net/nkdee
Suddenly the Cathedral is having a little severely aged savage
bourjoy spring rite at it's doorstep
including 'V is 4 Vessel', a male only collibri-addiction
- 6 lines starting with "i knew a girl once" -thing
you're all welcome to contribute 2 'V is 4 Vessel'
using your male mail addresses.
You can send in your verse to dv@vilt.net before 29/03/2006 2:47 GMT +1
plus anything to go with/underneath/above it that's under 1000 kb
heck you could even show us the film of your life as long as
it's got six lines of verse in it that start with
"i knew a girl once".
It don't need to be high literature, i've put a nice example on the homepage,
a masterfull verse by my good friend VuDu, the vempyre poet.
It don't need to be anything like that example. It don't need to be coy either.
It just needs to be six lines starting with "i knew a girl once".
4 days to go.
A personal selection of contributions will be published in a Cathedral Scroll at
http://www.vilt.net/nkdee/vis4vessel.jsp after 28/03/2006,
as soon as i can get them sorted out.
All contributions will be published at http://vis4vessel.blogspot.com
When you send sth in you will receive an invitation from the blog app,
so you'll be able to post there till kingdom come or google goes broke.
This is not an April Fools thing.
No press - no rewards except your own.
QT, MP3, SWF, PDF, larger bitmaps & shockwave will be hosted on ViLTNET
provided they're send before 29/03/2006 2:47 GMT +1
4 days to go.
Please state in your mail if & how
you want your credentials to appear,
preferably just provide a page i can link to
or fill out your blogspot profile.
KEYWORDS: spring, male, memory, gender, Cathedral, writing, whatever, www
FAQ:
Why the rush?
the Cathedral wants spontaneous stuff, no balanced art objects, it's a process thing.
If you can't come up with anything in 4 days that means it just wasn't there.
Why are u doing this?
Dunno. It's nearly Spring here & i heard a lot of guys complaining and getting moody lately.
Somehow, at one point they all started talking about a girl they once knew.
Who's gonna run the blog after 29/03/2006 2:47 GMT +1?
You are. Everybody gets admin rights to the blog, the first one who's in gets to delete my rights on 29/03/2006 2:47 GMT +1.
I don't feel ok with collabs after 3 or 4 days & besides i already have a Cathedral to run.
Why 29/03/2006 2:47 GMT +1?
It's 4 days from now if i got it right (i'm very stupid with time)
What will be your criterea for the personal selection?
if there's anything to select, i will primarily select stuff that _also_ comments
on writing and/or the WWW in a way that makes sense to me
Please spread this invitation anywhere you see fit.
sea ya,
dv @ Neue Kathedrale des erotischen Elends
http://www.vilt.net/nkdee
http://www.vilt.net/nkdee
Suddenly the Cathedral is having a little severely aged savage
bourjoy spring rite at it's doorstep
including 'V is 4 Vessel', a male only collibri-addiction
- 6 lines starting with "i knew a girl once" -thing
you're all welcome to contribute 2 'V is 4 Vessel'
using your male mail addresses.
You can send in your verse to dv@vilt.net before 29/03/2006 2:47 GMT +1
plus anything to go with/underneath/above it that's under 1000 kb
heck you could even show us the film of your life as long as
it's got six lines of verse in it that start with
"i knew a girl once".
It don't need to be high literature, i've put a nice example on the homepage,
a masterfull verse by my good friend VuDu, the vempyre poet.
It don't need to be anything like that example. It don't need to be coy either.
It just needs to be six lines starting with "i knew a girl once".
4 days to go.
A personal selection of contributions will be published in a Cathedral Scroll at
http://www.vilt.net/nkdee/vis4vessel.jsp after 28/03/2006,
as soon as i can get them sorted out.
All contributions will be published at http://vis4vessel.blogspot.com
When you send sth in you will receive an invitation from the blog app,
so you'll be able to post there till kingdom come or google goes broke.
This is not an April Fools thing.
No press - no rewards except your own.
QT, MP3, SWF, PDF, larger bitmaps & shockwave will be hosted on ViLTNET
provided they're send before 29/03/2006 2:47 GMT +1
4 days to go.
Please state in your mail if & how
you want your credentials to appear,
preferably just provide a page i can link to
or fill out your blogspot profile.
KEYWORDS: spring, male, memory, gender, Cathedral, writing, whatever, www
FAQ:
Why the rush?
the Cathedral wants spontaneous stuff, no balanced art objects, it's a process thing.
If you can't come up with anything in 4 days that means it just wasn't there.
Why are u doing this?
Dunno. It's nearly Spring here & i heard a lot of guys complaining and getting moody lately.
Somehow, at one point they all started talking about a girl they once knew.
Who's gonna run the blog after 29/03/2006 2:47 GMT +1?
You are. Everybody gets admin rights to the blog, the first one who's in gets to delete my rights on 29/03/2006 2:47 GMT +1.
I don't feel ok with collabs after 3 or 4 days & besides i already have a Cathedral to run.
Why 29/03/2006 2:47 GMT +1?
It's 4 days from now if i got it right (i'm very stupid with time)
What will be your criterea for the personal selection?
if there's anything to select, i will primarily select stuff that _also_ comments
on writing and/or the WWW in a way that makes sense to me
Please spread this invitation anywhere you see fit.
sea ya,
dv @ Neue Kathedrale des erotischen Elends
http://www.vilt.net/nkdee
Friday, March 24
pre-published excerpts by beate z.
Beate Zurwehme : Gender as paradigm f o r i n t e r a c t i v e a n d m e d i a a r t s
http://thing-net.de/cms/artikel252.html
http://thing-net.de/cms/artikel252.html
Tuesday, March 21
Bjorn Magnhildoen @ noemata.net
>http://noemata.net/formlessinterview.txt
what is the title of this project?
INFORMASJON
formless, informe
formless art
materialisasjon og elektronisk kunst
complexity of waste
default
are there any main art theoretical references?
(yve-alain bois rosalind e. krauss)
what is the main idea behind the project?
georges bataille, informe, as a third, since art theory has
been set up as a battle between form and content; whereas
the formless constitutes a third term which stands outside
the binary thinking which is itself formal.
how does it relate to your artistic practice?
what here is 'noemata'?
what would be a short description of the project?
"panorama of the formless"
what is the formless?
within a history of modernism that has always repressed
it in the interest of priveleging formal mastery.
in the domain of practice they analyze it as an operational
tool, the repressed structural cunning
neither theme nor form, formless is, as bataille himself
expressed it, a "job". the job of formless, the power of the informe.
everywhere you look it's the same
can you elaborate on that?
bataille: what it designates has no rights in any sense
and gets itself squashed everywhere, like a spider or
an earthworm. in fact, for academic men to be happy, the
universe would have to take shape. all of philosophy as
no other goal: it is a matter of giving a frock coat to
what is, a matemathical frock coat. on the other hand,
affirming that the universe resembles nothing and is
nly formless amounts to saying that the universe is
something like a spider or spit.
is formless the form or the content of the project?
as a conceptual tool, demonstrate the power, and
also pick apart certain categories that seemed
increasingly useless - 'form' and 'content'
and in the setting of audience subject and art object?
manet's subject is not located anywhere, not in the
rab world of naturalistic prose, nor in the absurd academic
fictions. rootlessness. uprooting, a slippage, the true goal
of his art is to "disappoint expectations", or just 'disappoint' then.
and each time it so happened that the public's frustrated
expectations only redoubled the effect of the picture.
its indifference to the subject
it is neither form nor content that interests bataille but the
operation that displaces both of them.
an 'operation' - which is to say neither a theme, nor a subject,
nor a concept - in bataille's thought - scatology or heterology.
piece of shit. attaining piece of shit
these operations split off from modernism, insulting the very
opposition of form and content, which is itself formal, arising
as it does from a binary logic, declaring it null and void.
quack
ink spots
blekkflekk
how can the formless be a project or be exhibited?
the formless is an operation, which support it being a project
and not things or outcome themselves.
no painter more heavily invested the subject, not with meaning,
but with that which goes beyond and is more significant than meaning.
mark of the formless, horizontality, base materialism, pulse,
entropy.
classification to declassify
not fetishization (shit) nor abjects (bodily fluids)
what would the horizontality be?
horizontality - man is proud to be erect, but this is
founded on a repression. vertical, man has no other
biological sense than to stare at the sun and thus
burn his eyes or to contemplate his feet in the mud.
his present architecture, by means of which his
horizontal gaze traverse a vertical visual field,
is a travesty.
marcel duchamp was a pitiless sleuth,
the default and the formless
default
the type of matter bataille wants to speak about is
what we have no idea of, what makes no sense..
matter cannot be reabsorbed by the image (the concept
of image presupposes a possible distinction between
form and matter, which the formless try to collapse)
bataille's matter is shit or laughter or an obscene
word or madness, whatever cuts all discussion short,
whatever eason cannot drape with a mathematical frock coat.
whatever does not lend itself to any metaphorical displacement,
whatever does not allow itself to be in-formed
according to bataille, matter is seductive waste,
appealing to what is most infantile in us, since
the blow it strikes is devolutionary, regressive, low
luguber
scatology, the science of what is wholly other
, or else map onto an expressionist model.
just as horizontality and base materialism contradict
the myths of human erectness and 'pure visuality', so
pulsation attacks the modernist exclustion of temporality
from the visual field. pulsation involves endless beat
that punctures the disembodied self-closure of pure visuality
what about the pulse?
the pulse alone sexualizes the gaze , rotoreliefs
machination, repetition, pulse puts into action an
infinite permutation that annuls metaphor through
metaphoric excess.
what about spam?
entropy, information theory,
run the risk of transforming the formless into a
figure, of stabilizing it. in displacing it
an implicit critique of art - everywhere is the same?
we enter the art gallery as though into a pharmacy,
looking for remedies nicely packaged for admissable
illnesses. whatever its outages, art is the prisoner
of its ancient cathartic function and thus, despite
everything, it remains an agent of social order: it
is at the service of homogeneity.
what is base materialism?
base materialism, of which informe is the most
concrete manifestation, has the job of de-classifying,
simultaneously lowering and liberating from all
ontological prisons, from any role model.
the formless matter that base materialism claims
for itself resembles nothing, especially not
what it should be.
what about the redundant, surplus value of art?
expenditure. freud analyzses s 54 the famous
symbolic transposition of excrement into gold
and establishes the relation between retention
and defecation (appropriation and excretion).
bataille: the jewel is associated with excrement
not only by contrast: they share a condition of
pure loss, the jewel is economic waste by definition.
the jewel, shit, and the fetish are all on the level
of sumptuary expenditure.
furthermore, all consumption of art is at least in
part fetishistic, but this is repressed.
heterological fetishism?
freud . dirt is matter in the wrong place
leiris, end of document : at present there is no
means of making something pass as ugly or repulsive.
even shit is pretty.
exquisite corpse, eros and death, two sides of chance:
endless possibility, and causality/automaton
the exquisite corpse is ruled by form, so much that
it's being emptied
jeu lugubre - were a structure rules absolutely
over any apparent play of happenstance, a structure
of recurrance and compulsion that "automates" and
programs the field in relation to death.
the mangy lion
Z.O.N.E. Of No Effort, does it radiate or not,
is it formless? would you say recursive is formless
what is the title of this project?
INFORMASJON
formless, informe
formless art
materialisasjon og elektronisk kunst
complexity of waste
default
are there any main art theoretical references?
(yve-alain bois rosalind e. krauss)
what is the main idea behind the project?
georges bataille, informe, as a third, since art theory has
been set up as a battle between form and content; whereas
the formless constitutes a third term which stands outside
the binary thinking which is itself formal.
how does it relate to your artistic practice?
what here is 'noemata'?
what would be a short description of the project?
"panorama of the formless"
what is the formless?
within a history of modernism that has always repressed
it in the interest of priveleging formal mastery.
in the domain of practice they analyze it as an operational
tool, the repressed structural cunning
neither theme nor form, formless is, as bataille himself
expressed it, a "job". the job of formless, the power of the informe.
everywhere you look it's the same
can you elaborate on that?
bataille: what it designates has no rights in any sense
and gets itself squashed everywhere, like a spider or
an earthworm. in fact, for academic men to be happy, the
universe would have to take shape. all of philosophy as
no other goal: it is a matter of giving a frock coat to
what is, a matemathical frock coat. on the other hand,
affirming that the universe resembles nothing and is
nly formless amounts to saying that the universe is
something like a spider or spit.
is formless the form or the content of the project?
as a conceptual tool, demonstrate the power, and
also pick apart certain categories that seemed
increasingly useless - 'form' and 'content'
and in the setting of audience subject and art object?
manet's subject is not located anywhere, not in the
rab world of naturalistic prose, nor in the absurd academic
fictions. rootlessness. uprooting, a slippage, the true goal
of his art is to "disappoint expectations", or just 'disappoint' then.
and each time it so happened that the public's frustrated
expectations only redoubled the effect of the picture.
its indifference to the subject
it is neither form nor content that interests bataille but the
operation that displaces both of them.
an 'operation' - which is to say neither a theme, nor a subject,
nor a concept - in bataille's thought - scatology or heterology.
piece of shit. attaining piece of shit
these operations split off from modernism, insulting the very
opposition of form and content, which is itself formal, arising
as it does from a binary logic, declaring it null and void.
quack
ink spots
blekkflekk
how can the formless be a project or be exhibited?
the formless is an operation, which support it being a project
and not things or outcome themselves.
no painter more heavily invested the subject, not with meaning,
but with that which goes beyond and is more significant than meaning.
mark of the formless, horizontality, base materialism, pulse,
entropy.
classification to declassify
not fetishization (shit) nor abjects (bodily fluids)
what would the horizontality be?
horizontality - man is proud to be erect, but this is
founded on a repression. vertical, man has no other
biological sense than to stare at the sun and thus
burn his eyes or to contemplate his feet in the mud.
his present architecture, by means of which his
horizontal gaze traverse a vertical visual field,
is a travesty.
marcel duchamp was a pitiless sleuth,
the default and the formless
default
the type of matter bataille wants to speak about is
what we have no idea of, what makes no sense..
matter cannot be reabsorbed by the image (the concept
of image presupposes a possible distinction between
form and matter, which the formless try to collapse)
bataille's matter is shit or laughter or an obscene
word or madness, whatever cuts all discussion short,
whatever eason cannot drape with a mathematical frock coat.
whatever does not lend itself to any metaphorical displacement,
whatever does not allow itself to be in-formed
according to bataille, matter is seductive waste,
appealing to what is most infantile in us, since
the blow it strikes is devolutionary, regressive, low
luguber
scatology, the science of what is wholly other
, or else map onto an expressionist model.
just as horizontality and base materialism contradict
the myths of human erectness and 'pure visuality', so
pulsation attacks the modernist exclustion of temporality
from the visual field. pulsation involves endless beat
that punctures the disembodied self-closure of pure visuality
what about the pulse?
the pulse alone sexualizes the gaze , rotoreliefs
machination, repetition, pulse puts into action an
infinite permutation that annuls metaphor through
metaphoric excess.
what about spam?
entropy, information theory,
run the risk of transforming the formless into a
figure, of stabilizing it. in displacing it
an implicit critique of art - everywhere is the same?
we enter the art gallery as though into a pharmacy,
looking for remedies nicely packaged for admissable
illnesses. whatever its outages, art is the prisoner
of its ancient cathartic function and thus, despite
everything, it remains an agent of social order: it
is at the service of homogeneity.
what is base materialism?
base materialism, of which informe is the most
concrete manifestation, has the job of de-classifying,
simultaneously lowering and liberating from all
ontological prisons, from any role model.
the formless matter that base materialism claims
for itself resembles nothing, especially not
what it should be.
what about the redundant, surplus value of art?
expenditure. freud analyzses s 54 the famous
symbolic transposition of excrement into gold
and establishes the relation between retention
and defecation (appropriation and excretion).
bataille: the jewel is associated with excrement
not only by contrast: they share a condition of
pure loss, the jewel is economic waste by definition.
the jewel, shit, and the fetish are all on the level
of sumptuary expenditure.
furthermore, all consumption of art is at least in
part fetishistic, but this is repressed.
heterological fetishism?
freud . dirt is matter in the wrong place
leiris, end of document : at present there is no
means of making something pass as ugly or repulsive.
even shit is pretty.
exquisite corpse, eros and death, two sides of chance:
endless possibility, and causality/automaton
the exquisite corpse is ruled by form, so much that
it's being emptied
jeu lugubre - were a structure rules absolutely
over any apparent play of happenstance, a structure
of recurrance and compulsion that "automates" and
programs the field in relation to death.
the mangy lion
Z.O.N.E. Of No Effort, does it radiate or not,
is it formless? would you say recursive is formless
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
